Of the three components,
participation rate, annual asset fee and cap, adjusting the cap usually has the
least effect. However, a movable annual asset fee can have an extreme impact on
indexed interest crediting.
A comparison of the impact of a cap vs. annual
asset fee over the past 50 years shows the following:
A 15% cap would
outperform a 4% asset fee 91% of the time.
A 15% cap would outperform
a 3% asset fee 85% of the time.
85% of the time, the actual increase
in the monthly average S&P 500 was less than 18%.
Here's
a question:
Which would you rather have, a cap that comes into play 15%
of the time, or an annual asset fee 100% of the time?
A 12% cap would
outperform a 4% asset fee 80% of the time.
A 12% cap would outperform
a 3% asset fee 77% of the time.
Over the past 50 years, 77% ot the
time in each of the past 50 years, the actual increase in the monthly average
S&P 500 was less than 15%.